Fact Sheet / Brief

Capitalizing on strategic opportunities: Examples from the field

Read webinar brief.

View recording.

Brian Mealor, Associate Professor and Director of the Sheridan Research and Extension Center, UW, discusses strategic opportunities where land managers can intervene to move the needle on cheatgrass. It describes the level of invasion and management strategies applicable to each. Then, Mike Pellant, Ecologist, Retired BLM, discusses post-fire opportunities, cheatgrass die-off areas, and the myths and realities of dormant season targeted grazing.

This webinar was the fourth in our 2018 Webinar Series: Moving the Needle on Cheatgrass: Putting What We Know into Practice.

Ecologically based invasive plant management: Lessons from the area-wide demonstration project

Read webinar brief.

View recording.

This webinar discusses the process as well as take home messages from area-wide demonstration projects on cheatgrass reduction. Roger Sheley, USDA ARS, presented.

This webinar was the last in our 2018 Webinar Series: Moving the Needle on Cheatgrass: Putting What We Know into Practice.

Cheatgrass control methods and their impacts on perennial grasses: A systematic review spanning 64 years

Read webinar brief.

Webinar recording.

Reducing cheatgrass has been a primary research topic and goal of ecological restoration for over 50 years. Our work examined published studies between 1946 and 2012 to identify how a broad range of control methods influence cheatgrass and perennial grass abundance. Based on this assessment, we identify obstacles encountered in achieving desired restoration and clarify what research is needed to develop improved mechanistic control strategies. Jeremy Maestas, Ecologist, USDA-NRCS, and Tom Monaco, Ecologist, USDA-ARS and USU, present.

This webinar is the first in our 2018 Webinar Series: Moving the Needle on Cheatgrass: Putting What We Know into Practice.

Managing cheatgrass by putting what we know into practice: Briefs for 2018 Webinar Series

View flyer.

Conversion of native rangelands to cheatgrass, and subsequent impacts on wildfire regimes, are one of the most challenging threats to sagebrush ecosystems today. The widespread and complex nature of the problem and lack of clarity on effective management actions are often barriers to implementing meaningful treatments and practices to reduce risks. Although there is no silver bullet, combining cheatgrass reduction treatments with promotion or restoration of perennial vegetation in an integrated, adaptive management framework can move the needle toward maintenance and recovery of functioning ecosystems. This webinar series will provide information on integrated management approaches using specific strategies and proven tools.

Webinar briefs and recordings linked below:

Cheatgrass control methods and their impacts on perennial grasses: A systematic review spanning 64 years (Tom Monaco, ARS) –
Webinar summary (print)
Webinar recording (video)

Herbicides for cheatgrass: What works? (Richard Lee, BLM)
Webinar summary (print)
Webinar recording (video)

Grazing to maintain perennial grasses and reduce nonnative annuals (Kirk Davies, ARS)
Webinar summary (print)
Webinar recording (video)

Capitalizing on strategic opportunities: Examples from the field (Brian Mealor, UW and Mike Pellant, BLM-retired)
Webinar summary (print)
Webinar recording (video)

Ecologically based invasive plant management: Lessons from the area-wide demonstration project (Roger Sheley, ARS)
Webinar summary (print)
Webinar recording (video)

Brought to you by the Great Basin Fire Science Exchange, in partnership with the USDA/NRCS, Sage Grouse Initiative, BLM, ARS, and FS.

Populations of sage-grouse increase with conifer removal

View brief.

There are two key takeaways from the research: 1) conifer removal is an effective tool for increasing sage grouse populations, and 2) sage grouse populations may take several years to respond to management actions because they are long lived and have lower reproductive output compared to other game birds.

Woodland management in sagebrush- The big picture

View brief.

Study findings include:

  • From 2011-2017, the extent of conifer cover in sagebrush country decreased by 1.6%. Human management efforts are responsible for 2/3 of the total reduction; the other 1/3 is due to wildfires.
  • Previous estimates suggest that conifer cover in sagebrush country is growing by 0.4%-1.5% annually, which means that our efforts are keeping pace with conifer encroachment but that more needs to be done.
  • Public/private partnerships are successfully reducing conifers in highly targeted priority watersheds, such as in northwest Utah.
  • The maps also show that woodlands are still expanding into many sagebrush landscapes. Continued partnership efforts are needed to strategically conserve priority shrublands.

Sage-grouse require sagebrush steppe- An infographic

View infographic.

Relationship between sagebrush habitat characteristics and sage-grouse use in a graphic summary.

Pinyon-juniper expansion in the Great Basin- An infographic

View infographic.

Reasons and consequences of pinyon-juniper expansion and treatment options are provided in a graphic summary.

Community conversations: Applying traditional knowledge to fire management

View brief.

Challenges and solutions in applying TK and western knowledge (WK) to current approaches of wildland fire, fuels, and natural and cultural resource management.

Mountain big sagebrush – Fire regimes

View brief.

Estimates of historical fire regime parameters in mountain big sagebrush communities can be compared with current fire regimes and trends to establish general guidelines for ecological restoration. A synthesis of information on historical patterns and contemporary changes in fuels and fire regimes in mountain big sagebrush communities is available in the Fire Effects Information System (FEIS). This research brief summarizes information from that FEIS Fire Regime Synthesis.

Narrow your search

Stay Connected