Invasive Species

Open book with lines simulating text on left and right pages

Population biology of cheatgrass in forests: Effect of disturbance, grazing, and litter on seedling establishment and reproduction

View article.

In the more open Pinus ponderosa and Pseudotsuga menziesii forests, cheatgrass colonization may often occur in openings in the understory alone. Colonization in the more shady A. grandis and Thuja plicata forests is unlikely, however, unless the opening extends through both the understory and the overstory. As a result, cheatgrass is unlikely to increase in any of these forests unless the scale and incidence of disturbance increases substantially.

Open book with a bar chart on left page and line graph and lines simulating text on the right page

Use of livestock to control cheatgrass – A review

View review.

Proper grazing management appears urgent in preventing or delaying further encroachment of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) into perennial vegetation on western grazing lands and subsequently gaining site dominance. In mixed stands with desirable perennials, livestock grazing might be directed to (1) reducing cheatgrass competition by concentrating grazing of cheatgrass during dough seed stage, providing perennials still have opportunity to complete their life cycles, or (2) basing grazing on the needs of perennials while mostly ignoring cheatgrass. When cheatgrass domination results in a closed community, alternatives appear limited to (1) managing as annual grassland, or (2) revegetation using intensive cultural practices. In conjunction with revegetation, livestock might conceivably be employed for “graze out” in site preparation and I or for selective plant control during germination and emergence of the seeded perennials. However, with these possible limited exceptions, grazing is concluded not to be an effective general tool for cheatgrass control.

Open book with lines simulating text on left and right pages

Cheatgrass and range science: 1930-1950

View paper.

This paper provides a historical perspective of the influence of cheatgrass invasion on western rangelands (1930-1950). This was a period of awakening interest by range scientists. Range managers, the livestock industry, and scientists have always bad a love-bate relationship with cheatgrass. It provides the bulk of the forage on many ranges, yet it is the symbol of environmental degradation. Trying to cope with the endless ramifications of cheatgrass invasion, dominance, persistence, and potential community decline keep forcing scientists to critically evaluate the ecological principles upon which range management is based.

Open book with lines simulating text on left and right pages

Targeted livestock grazing to suppress invasive annual grasses

View chapter.

The range livestock industry has adapted to the presence of invasive annual grasses, especially where infestations are extensive. Light to moderate livestock grazing provides enough standing grass at the end of the grazing season to limit soil erosion and conserve soil moisture and nutrients. Elsewhere, however, where infestations of invasive annual grasses are less extensive or less advanced, opportunities exist for using targeted, or prescribed, livestock grazing to suppress annual grass plants. This chapter focuses on using prescribed livestock grazing to suppress invasive annual grasses on sites where these grasses are considered weedy invaders.

Open book with lines simulating text on left and right pages

Cheatgrass and grazing rangelands

View article.

Let us examine each of C. E. Fleming’s contentions concerning the status of cheatgrass as a forage species in light of what has happened during the last half of the 20th century to Nevada rangelands. Hindsight is a wonderful procedure that allows one to be pretentious, so we evaluate the Fleming contentions in terms of their foresight.

Open book with lines simulating text on left and right pages

Defoliation effects on cheatgrass seed production: Implications for grazing

View paper.

Although this study helped pinpoint optimal defoliation parameters for cheatgrass control, it also called into question the potential for livestock grazing to be an effective seed-bed preparation technique in native plant reseeding projects in cheatgrass-dominated areas.

Open book with lines simulating text on left and right pages

Effects of targeted grazing and prescribed burning on community and seed dynamics of a cheatgrass–dominated landscape

View article.

Cattle removed 80 to 90% of standing biomass in grazed plots in May of 2005 and 2006 when B. tectorum was in the boot (phenological) stage. Grazed and ungrazed plots were burned in October 2005 and 2006. The combined grazing–burning treatment was more effective than either treatment alone in reducing B. tectorum seed input and seed bank density, and in shifting species composition from a community dominated by B. tectorum to one composed of a suite of species, with B. tectorum as a component rather than a dominant. This study provides a meso-scale precursor for landscape-scale adaptive management using grazing and burning methodologies.

Open book with lines simulating text on left and right pages

Conditions favoring cheatgrass dominance of endangered sagebrush steppe ecosystems

View paper.

Grazing exacerbates Bromus tectorum dominance in one of North America’s most endangered ecosystems by adversely impacting key mechanisms mediating resistance to invasion. If the goal is to conserve and restore resistance of these systems, managers should consider maintaining or restoring: (i) high bunchgrass cover and structure characterized by spatially dispersed bunchgrasses and small gaps between them; (ii) a diverse assemblage of bunchgrass species to maximize competitive interactions with B. tectorum in time and space; and (iii) biological soil crusts to limit B. tectorum establishment. Passive restoration by reducing cumulative cattle grazing may be one of the most effective means of achieving these three goals.

Single sheet of paper with bullet points

Limiting medusahead invasion and impacts in the Great Basin

View fact sheet, pg. 9.

This fact sheet provides managers with strategies to reduce the spread and impact of medusahead.

View all topics reviewed in the Fact Sheet series.

Single sheet of paper with bullet points

Reestablishing perennial-dominated plant communities in medusahead-invaded sagebrush rangeland

View fact sheet, pg. 12.

This fact sheet provides managers with tools and strategies to reestablish perennial-dominated plant communities in medusahead-invaded sagebrush rangelands.

View all topics reviewed in the Fact Sheet series.

Narrow your search

Stay Connected